Common Law vs. Statutory Law

Common Law:
For hundreds of years dating back to the early Justice System of England, the courts have developed what has been called The Common Law. Early in England's history, judges were asked to decide legal cases according to what they felt most persons (the common person) would think was right. To find out what most persons think is right, the judges followed the customs of the community and the common beliefs of the people. In deciding a particular case the judge would look to previously decided cases with the similar issues and facts. The earlier decision was given precedent or priority and closely followed by the second judge in making a decision on the case at issue. When a large number of judges decided the same kind of case or question of law in the same way, the decision became "The Law." It could only be changed when the customs and beliefs of the community changed.

Lawyers learned common law by reading reports in which judges gave reasons for their decisions. By reading many decisions of the same kind, a lawyer could see how a rule developed and how it was applied.

Statutory Law:
In the current justice system, not only are Judges often asked to apply Common Law to a case but they are also asked to interpret Statutory Law and apply it to a variety of fact situations. Statutory law is made by the power of the legislature. Most state legislatures meet every year to consider passing new laws that are considered for new and emerging problems. Many of the laws that are passed are then used as a basis for bringing a lawsuit and it is at that time that the Judge is asked to interpret the meaning of the statute to the facts of the case.

Back to General Civil Litigation